Home/Compare/NDQ vs FANG

NDQvsFANG

Broad tech exposure or concentrated mega-cap tech bet?

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF · BetaShares FANG+ ETF

Overall Winner
FANGwins 4 of 7 comparable metrics

NDQ holds the 100 largest Nasdaq companies across tech, healthcare and consumer sectors; FANG concentrates in ~10 mega-cap names. FANG amplifies gains - and losses - from a handful of stocks, making it a higher-conviction bet vs the more diversified NDQ.

NDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
50
ETFCheck Score
$50.64-0.90%
3/7 metrics won
vs
FANG
BetaShares FANG+ ETF
60
ETFCheck Score
$29.36-1.51%
4/7 metrics won
NDQ
Metric
FANG
50
ETFCheck Score
60
0.48%
Annual Fee (MER)
lower = better
0.35%
+13.3%
1Y Return
+10.4%
+20.6%
3Y Return (p.a.)
+29.5%
0.95%
Distribution Yield
6.04%
$7,912.4M
Assets Under Mgmt
$1,268.4M
$10.7M
Avg Daily Turnover
$2.9M
$50.64
Unit Price
$29.36

Score Breakdown

28Fees (40%)48
81Fund Size (25%)52
79Liquidity (20%)65
16Yield (15%)100
50Total Score60

Fund Profiles

NDQ

BetaShares manages NDQ, Australia's largest technology-focused ETF by assets, tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index which comprises 100 of the biggest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. Despite occasional misconceptions, NDQ provides unhedged exposure, meaning Australian investors are subject to AUD/USD currency movements alongside the performance of holdings like Apple, Microsoft, and NVIDIA. Tech-focused investors and those seeking high-growth US equity exposure as a satellite allocation will find NDQ a straightforward way to access the world's most prominent technology and innovation companies.

FANG

BetaShares NYSE FANG+ ETF tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index, providing highly concentrated exposure to just ten leading global technology companies including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, and Meta. With so few holdings, the fund carries significant single-stock concentration risk and tends to be substantially more volatile than broader market indices. It appeals to growth-focused investors seeking an aggressive satellite position in mega-cap tech, though its narrow composition makes it unsuitable as a core portfolio holding.

Related Comparisons

NDQvsHNDQ
Hedged vs unhedged Nasdaq 100
NDQvsSEMI
Nasdaq 100 vs pure semiconductors